Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2024; 121(12): e20240430

Impact of 3D Printing on Cardiac Surgery in Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Davi Shunji Yahiro ORCID logo , Mariana de Paula Cruz ORCID logo , Brenda Ficheira Coelho Ribeiro ORCID logo , Luiza Meireles Teixeira ORCID logo , Maria Fernanda Ribeiro Mendes de Oliveira ORCID logo , Aurea Lúcia Alves de Azevedo Grippa de Souza ORCID logo , Ana Flávia Malheiros Torbey ORCID logo , Juliana Serafim da Silveira ORCID logo , Claudio Tinoco Mesquita ORCID logo

DOI: 10.36660/abc.20240430i

This Original Article is referred by the Short Editorial "The Role of 3D Printing in Cardiac Surgery for Congenital Heart Diseases".

Abstract

Background

Congenital heart disease (CHD) poses significant challenges in surgical management due to the complexity of cardiac anatomy. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a promising tool in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and medical education for CHD surgeries.

Objectives

We aimed to systematically review the literature on the utilization and benefits of 3D printing technology in CHD surgical interventions.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed and EMBASE for studies published up to February of 2024. We included controlled and uncontrolled studies investigating the surgical role of 3D printing in CHD patients. We conducted a single-arm meta-analysis estimating the proportion of change in treatment planning due to the use of 3D printed-models. Moreover, studies that compared 3D printing to conventional care were included into the meta-analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 444 patients undergoing CHD surgeries with 3D printing assistance. Preoperative planning aided by 3D models led to changing surgical decisions in 35 of 75 cases (51.8%; 95% CI 26.6-77.0%, I2=80.68%, p=0.001) and reduced total operative time in 22.25 minutes in favor of the 3D printing group (95%CI 49.95; 5.80 min, I2=0%, p=0.817) but without statistical significance. Albeit in a smaller sample, other endpoints (mechanical ventilation and ICU time) demonstrated some benefit from the technology but without statistical significance.

Conclusions

By providing personalized anatomical models, 3D printing may facilitate surgical planning and execution. More studies are needed to investigate the effects of 3D printing on reducing intervention, hospitalization, and mechanical ventilation times.

Impact of 3D Printing on Cardiac Surgery in Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comments

Skip to content