Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2024; 121(5): e20230467

Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: 10-Year Analysis of the TAVIDOR Registry

Vinicius Esteves ORCID logo , Pedro Beraldo de Andrade ORCID logo , Cleverson Neves Zukowski ORCID logo , Edmur Araujo, Cristiano Guedes Bezerra ORCID logo , Adriano Dourado Oliveira, Eduardo Pessoa de Melo, Gustavo Gama, Rodrigo Cantarelli ORCID logo , Luiz Alberto Piva e Mattos, Angelo Tedeschi, Vitor Alves Loures ORCID logo , Vitor Vahle ORCID logo , Guilherme Barreto Gameiro Silva, Miguel Antonio Neves Rati, Augusto Celso Lopes ORCID logo , Nilson de Moura Fé Filho, Gustavo Alves ORCID logo , Sérgio Costa Tavares Filho, Sergio Kreimer, Marden Tebet, Felipe Maia, Maurício Sales de Oliveira, Alberto Fonseca, Angelina Camiletti, Denilson Campos de Albuquerque ORCID logo , Olga Ferreira de Souza ORCID logo

DOI: 10.36660/abc.202300467i

Abstract

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has established itself as the preferential strategy to approach severe aortic stenosis. Information on procedural improvements and nationwide results obtained with the technique throughout the past decade are unknown.

Objectives

To assess the temporal variation of the demographic profile, procedural characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI procedures at the Rede D’Or São Luiz.

Methods

Observational registry comprising 29 national institutions, comparing the characteristics of the TAVI procedures performed from 2012 to 2017 (Group 1) to those performed from 2018 to 2023 (Group 2). The statistical significance level adopted was p < 0.05.

Results

This study assessed 661 patients, 95 in Group 1 and 566 in Group 2, with a mean age of 81.1 years. Group 1 patients had a higher prevalence of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and STS risk score > 8%. In addition, they more often underwent general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring, and access through femoral dissection. Group 2 patients had a higher success rate of the TAVI procedure (95.4% versus 89.5%; p = 0.018), lower mortality (3.9% versus 11.6%; p = 0.004), and less often needed permanent pacemaker implantation (8.5% versus 17.9%; p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The 10-year temporal trends analysis of the TAVIDOR Registry shows a reduction in patients’ clinical complexity over time. Furthermore, the advance to minimalistic implantation techniques, added to the technological evolution of the devices, may have contributed to the favorable outcomes observed among those whose implantation occurred in the last 5 years studied.

Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: 10-Year Analysis of the TAVIDOR Registry

Comments

Skip to content