Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2025; 122(2): e20250057

High-Power Short Duration or Pulsed Field Ablation: What is the Best Choice for AF Ablation?

José Carlos Pachon-M ORCID logo , Enrique I. Pachon-M ORCID logo , Tasso J. Lobo ORCID logo , Tomas G. Santillana-P, Carlos Thiene C. Pachon

DOI: 10.36660/abc.20250057i

This Short Editorial is referred by the Research article "Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: Electroporation Against High-Power Short Duration Radiofrequency".

Conclusion

Both methods highlight the advancements in AF ablation techniques, focusing on improving procedural efficiency and safety. The HPSD meta-analysis demonstrates that high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation reduces AF recurrence and procedural times while minimizing complications like esophageal injury. On the other hand, the PFA meta-analysis shows that pulsed field ablation offers shorter procedural times compared to traditional thermal ablation, with no significant difference in complications or AF recurrence. Finally, a highly relevant issue that has not been adequately considered in these studies is the extent of vagal denervation resulting from these techniques. It is well established that a greater degree of vagal denervation, including the potential incorporation of cardioneuroablation, is strongly associated with a significant reduction in long-term recurrence rates.

[…]

High-Power Short Duration or Pulsed Field Ablation: What is the Best Choice for AF Ablation?

Comments

Skip to content